Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Rates and Impact of Serious Adverse Events after Endovascular Thrombectomy among Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke
Bo Lei1, Shuang Yang2,3, Ling Tian4
1Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Leshan People's Hospital, Leshan, China.
Insights
Serious adverse events (SAEs) are common after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for stroke, impacting functional independence. Advanced age, higher NIHSS scores, and failed recanalization increase SAE risk, necessitating clinical awareness.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Serious adverse events (SAEs) are frequent complications in large vessel occlusion stroke treatment.
- The impact of SAEs on patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence and clinical significance of SAEs in patients after EVT.
- To identify predictors of SAEs and their association with patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A post hoc analysis of pooled data from the DEVT and RESCUE BT trials.
- SAEs included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, brain herniation, respiratory or circulatory failure, pneumonia, DVT, and systemic bleeding.
- Functional independence (mRS 0-2 at 90 days) was the primary endpoint; logistic regression analyzed predictors and outcomes.
Main Results:
- Of 1,182 patients, 63% experienced 1,404 SAEs, with 4.65% in-hospital mortality.
- Pneumonia (52.5%), systemic bleeding (14.7%), and respiratory failure (14.6%) were most common.
- Predictors of SAEs included advanced age, higher NIHSS, M2 vs. ICA occlusion, longer procedure time, and failed recanalization. SAEs were associated with lower functional independence (aOR 0.46).
Conclusions:
- SAEs are prevalent (>60%) after EVT for stroke and linked to functional dependence.
- Key predictors for SAEs are advanced age, high NIHSS, prolonged procedure duration, and unsuccessful recanalization.
- Understanding SAE prevalence and predictors aids clinicians in assessing post-EVT risks.
Objective:
Complications or serious adverse events (SAEs) are common in the treatment of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. There has been limited study of the impact of SAEs for patients after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). The goal of this study was to characterize the rates and clinical impact of SAEs following EVT.
Methods:
A post hoc analysis was performed using pooled databases of the "DEVT" and "RESCUE BT" trials. SAEs were designated as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, brain herniation or craniectomy, respiratory failure, circulatory failure, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, and systemic bleeding. The primary endpoint was functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0-2 within 90 days). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors and associations between SAEs and outcomes.
Results:
Of 1,182 enrolled patients, 402 (34%) had a procedural complication and 745 (63%) had 1,404 SAE occurrences with 4.65% in-hospital mortality. The three most frequent SAEs were pneumonia (620, 52.5%), systemic bleeding (174, 14.7%), and respiratory failure (173, 14.6%). Pneumonia, systemic bleeding, or deep venous thrombosis was less life-threatening. Patients with advanced age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.43]), higher NIHSS (1.09 [1.06-1.11]), occlusion site (middle cerebral artery-M1 vs. internal carotid artery [ICA]: 0.75 [0.53-1.04]; M2 vs. ICA: 1.30 [0.80-2.12]), longer procedure time (1.01 [1.00-1.01]), and unsuccessful vessel recanalization (1.79 [1.06-2.94]) were more likely to experience SAEs. Compared with no SAE, patients with SAEs had lower odds of functional independence (0.46 [0.40-0.54]).
Conclusions:
Overall, SAEs diagnosed following thrombectomy in patients with stroke were common (more than 60%) and associated with functional dependence. Patients with advanced age, higher NIHSS, longer procedure time, and failed recanalization were more likely to experience SAEs. There was no statistical difference in the risk of SAEs among patients with M1 and M2 occluded compared with those ICA occluded. An understanding of the prevalence and predictors of SAEs could alert clinicians to the estimated risk of an SAE for a patient after EVT.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology

