Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
Published on: October 13, 2023
Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-D Report:
Medha Barbhaiya1, Stephane Zuily2, Mary-Carmen Amigo3
1Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York.
The 2023 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) criteria use multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to weigh candidate factors. Separate clinical and laboratory domain thresholds were established for APS classification, enhancing specificity.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Immunology
- Medical Classification Systems
Background:
- The 2023 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria were developed to identify patients with a high likelihood of APS for research purposes.
- Previous phases (I and II) generated 27 candidate criteria, categorized into laboratory and clinical domains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize the final stage (Phase III) of the APS classification criteria development.
- To employ a consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to determine the relative weights of candidate criteria.
- To establish a threshold score for classifying patients with APS.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of 192 international patients with suspected APS and diverse manifestations.
- Subcommittee members ranked 20 representative patients and refined candidate criteria definitions.
- An MCDA exercise using 1000Minds software assigned weights based on consensus decisions and pairwise comparisons.
- Patients were rank-ordered using additive scores, and a consensus threshold was set.
Main Results:
- Initial evaluation revealed variability in APS assessment among subcommittee members.
- MCDA facilitated 81 pairwise decisions, establishing a hierarchy of domain items.
- The Steering Committee determined that separate clinical and laboratory scores, not a single aggregate score, are necessary for high specificity in APS classification.
Conclusions:
- Preliminary weights for candidate APS classification criteria were determined using MCDA.
- The new APS classification criteria uniquely incorporate separate thresholds for clinical and laboratory domains, diverging from single-aggregate score systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

