Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
Published on: September 13, 2022
Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in dental implant surgery
1Attending, Department of Stomatology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Statement Of Problem:
Autonomous dental implant robot systems (ADIRSs) have been marketed for dental implant surgery; however, research on their accuracy is limited.
Purpose:
The purpose of this clinical study was to examine the accuracy of an ADIRS.
Material And Methods:
Seventy-four participants with partial edentulism underwent implant surgery by using the ADIRS. Before surgery, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was conducted, and its image data were fed into the ADIRS navigation and positioning system for iterative reconstruction and surgical path planning. After local anesthesia administration, area disinfection, and patient registration, the robot prepared the osteotomy and placed the implant under guidance of the navigation system. A postoperative CBCT scan was made to assess deviations between the planned and actual implant positions. The global coronal, apical, and angular deviations were measured and analyzed. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to compare the differences in major outcome variables (α=.05).
Results:
All implant procedures were successfully carried out without any complications during surgery. A total of 86 implants were placed in 74 participants. The mean ±standard deviation global coronal deviation, global apical deviation, and angular deviation was 0.61 ±0.20 mm (95% CI: 0.23 to 1.0 mm), 0.79 ±0.32 mm (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.41 mm), and 2.56 ±1.10 degrees (95% CI: 0.42 to 4.70 degrees), respectively. The findings from the GLMM revealed that the implant region (premolar, molar; maxilla, mandible; left, right), implant length, and surgeon did not significantly impact accuracy (P>.05).
Conclusions:
ADIRS showed high accuracy for implant placement because of the control of angular deviation and axial errors. The implant region, implant length, and surgeon had no significant influence on the accuracy of implant placement. Nevertheless, more clinical studies are required to support evidence-based clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
05:49Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024