Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

08:57
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
15.8K
A macroevolutionary analysis of European Late Upper Palaeolithic stone tool shape using a Bayesian phylodynamic
David N Matzig1, Ben Marwick2, Felix Riede1
1Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Højbjerg, Denmark.
Royal Society Open Science
|August 15, 2024
Summary
This study introduces a new Bayesian phylodynamic approach for analyzing cultural evolution in archaeology. This method reveals projectile point evolution and diversification rates during the European Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic periods.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Archaeology
- Palaeobiology
- Cultural Macroevolution
Background:
- Phylogenetic models are crucial for studying organismal evolution and have been applied to human sciences using linguistic and cultural data.
- Evolutionary archaeology predominantly uses parsimony-based phylogenetic analyses with discrete traits, limiting downstream applications.
- Recent advances in Bayesian phylogenetics enable inference of evolutionary dynamics using continuous characters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an exploratory analysis of cultural macroevolution using projectile point shape in the European Final Palaeolithic and earliest Mesolithic.
- To apply a Bayesian phylodynamic approach and the fossilized birth-death process model to archaeological data.
- To demonstrate a methodological breakthrough by extending Bayesian phylodynamic models to archaeology.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Bayesian phylodynamic approach, incorporating the fossilized birth-death process model.
- Analyzed continuous character data (projectile point shape) from the European Final Palaeolithic and earliest Mesolithic (approx. 15,000–11,000 BP).
- Inferred evolutionary dynamics, including divergence times and diversification rates, while accounting for uncertainties.
Main Results:
- Generated a cultural phylogeny for projectile point evolution.
- Estimated divergence times and diversification rates, allowing comparison with climatic changes.
- Demonstrated the capability of the model to incorporate uncertainties in phylogenetic inference.
Conclusions:
- The Bayesian phylodynamic approach offers a significant advancement over traditional parsimony methods in evolutionary archaeology.
- This methodology allows for a more comprehensive understanding of cultural macroevolutionary processes.
- The study highlights the potential of extending sophisticated phylogenetic models to archaeological research.
Related Concept Videos
Phylogeny
43.7K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
43.7K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Phylogenetic Trees
45.3K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
45.3K
Speciation Rates
21.1K
Overview
21.1K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.1K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.1K
Eukaryotic Evolution
33.0K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
33.0K

