Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Large Language Model Influence on Management Reasoning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ethan Goh1,2, Robert Gallo3, Eric Strong4
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Importance:
Large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown promise in diagnostic reasoning, but their utility in management reasoning with no clear right answers is unknown.
Objective:
To determine whether LLM assistance improves physician performance on open-ended management reasoning tasks compared to conventional resources.
Design:
Prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted from 30 November 2023 to 21 April 2024.
Setting:
Multi-institutional study from Stanford University, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the University of Virginia involving physicians from across the United States.
Participants:
92 practicing attending physicians and residents with training in internal medicine, family medicine, or emergency medicine.
Intervention:
Five expert-developed clinical case vignettes were presented with multiple open-ended management questions and scoring rubrics created through a Delphi process. Physicians were randomized to use either GPT-4 via ChatGPT Plus in addition to conventional resources (e.g., UpToDate, Google), or conventional resources alone.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was difference in total score between groups on expert-developed scoring rubrics. Secondary outcomes included domain-specific scores and time spent per case.
Results:
Physicians using the LLM scored higher compared to those using conventional resources (mean difference 6.5 %, 95% CI 2.7-10.2, p<0.001). Significant improvements were seen in management decisions (6.1%, 95% CI 2.5-9.7, p=0.001), diagnostic decisions (12.1%, 95% CI 3.1-21.0, p=0.009), and case-specific (6.2%, 95% CI 2.4-9.9, p=0.002) domains. GPT-4 users spent more time per case (mean difference 119.3 seconds, 95% CI 17.4-221.2, p=0.02). There was no significant difference between GPT-4-augmented physicians and GPT-4 alone (-0.9%, 95% CI -9.0 to 7.2, p=0.8).
Conclusions And Relevance:
LLM assistance improved physician management reasoning compared to conventional resources, with particular gains in contextual and patient-specific decision-making. These findings indicate that LLMs can augment management decision-making in complex cases.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06208423; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06208423.
More Related Videos
05:15The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Regression Toward the Mean
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
Group Design