Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

07:12
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
Published on: July 1, 2014
12.3K
Don't Let Your Analysis Go to Seed: On the Impact of Random Seed on Machine Learning-based Causal Inference
Lindsey Schader1, Weishan Song1, Russell Kempker2
1From the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|August 16, 2024
Summary
Random seeds significantly impact machine learning causal effect estimates, particularly doubly robust estimators. We present stabilization techniques to ensure reliable results in epidemiologic analyses.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Computer Science
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) enhances causal effect estimation in epidemiology, reducing reliance on strict model assumptions.
- The inherent randomness in ML algorithms can lead to results influenced by the initial random seed.
- Doubly robust estimators are a popular ML approach for causal inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of random seeds on doubly robust estimators in causal effect estimation.
- To develop and validate methods for stabilizing ML-based causal estimates against random seed variability.
- To provide practical guidance for minimizing seed-related bias in epidemiological research.
Main Methods:
- Examined the impact of varying random seeds on doubly robust estimators using a single dataset.
- Developed and implemented techniques to stabilize estimation results across different random seeds.
- Conducted an extensive simulation study to evaluate the effectiveness of stabilization methods.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that different random seeds can lead to divergent scientific interpretations of causal estimates.
- Showcased that proposed stabilization techniques effectively mitigate seed-related variability.
- Confirmed that stabilization does not compromise the statistical efficiency of the estimators.
Conclusions:
- Random seeds introduce substantial variability in ML-based causal effect estimation, affecting scientific conclusions.
- Stabilization techniques offer a robust solution to ensure reproducible and reliable results in epidemiological studies.
- Researchers should actively address and report random seed influence in ML applications for causal inference.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K
Random Error
849
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
849
Causality in Epidemiology
352
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
352
Censoring Survival Data
72
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
72
Random Variables
11.5K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
11.5K
Survival Tree
73
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
73

