Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell Lines01:16

Cell Lines

7.3K
A cell line is a population of cells grown in vitro that can be subcultured over several generations. Normal cells cease to divide after a certain number of cell divisions, a process known as replicative senescence. This number, called the Hayflick limit, was conceptualized by Leonard Hayflick in 1961 when he observed that fetal cells grown in culture could only divide 40-60 times. This limit is due to the shortening of the telomeres during each round of cell division, preventing cell division...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Indiana University Brain Health Program to deliver amyloid-targeted therapy to Alzheimer's disease patients.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Ā·2026
Same author

Outcomes for Frail Dialysis Patients Not Referred for Transplantation: A Cohort Study.

Journal of the American Geriatrics SocietyĀ·2026
Same author

Cognitive dispersion profiles and prediction of cognitive change in early-onset dementias: Results from LEADS.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationĀ·2026
Same author

Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.

Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicineĀ·2026
Same author

External Validation and Recalibration of a Risk Calculator for Major Bleeding After Diagnostic Kidney Biopsy.

Kidney medicineĀ·2026
Same author

Criterion and convergent validity of plasma biomarkers in early-onset Alzheimer's disease: Initial findings from LEADS.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Ā·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.9K

What factors influence cellular pathologists' confidence in case reporting?

Harriet Evans1,2, Peter K Kimani3, Louise Hiller3

  • 1Histopathology Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK. harriet.evans4@nhs.net.

Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology
|August 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pathologist diagnostic confidence varies, influenced by case complexity and diagnostic agreement, not experience. While digital pathology shows slightly lower confidence, pathologists remain confident using it for diagnoses.

Keywords:
Breast pathologyDiagnostic confidenceDigital pathologyGastrointestinal pathologyRenal pathologySkin pathology

More Related Videos

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens
10:49

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens

Published on: January 21, 2019

20.5K
Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.9K
Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens
10:49

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens

Published on: January 21, 2019

20.5K
Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Histopathology
  • Digital Pathology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Histopathology is an interpretive discipline where pathologist diagnostic confidence varies.
  • Quantifying diagnostic confidence and its influencing factors in histopathology is understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify pathologist diagnostic confidence across multiple variables and specialties.
  • To identify factors influencing diagnostic confidence in histopathology, comparing light microscopy (LM) and digital pathology (DP).

Main Methods:

  • Sixteen pathologists from six NHS trusts analyzed 16,187 diagnoses across four specialties.
  • Each case was reported twice by each pathologist: once on LM and once on DP.
  • Pathologists recorded diagnostic confidence using a 7-point Likert scale for each diagnosis.

Main Results:

  • All investigated variables significantly predicted diagnostic confidence, except pathologist experience.
  • Lower confidence was associated with difficult cases, diagnostic variation (inter- and intra-pathologist), and incorrect diagnoses.
  • Nominally higher confidence was observed for LM (rate ratio 1.09) versus DP, though pathologists expressed confidence in DP reporting.

Conclusions:

  • Diagnostic confidence in histopathology is influenced by case difficulty, diagnostic agreement, and accuracy, but not experience.
  • External quality control and peer review are valuable for improving reporting accuracy and confidence.
  • While LM showed slightly higher confidence, DP is a reliable tool for histopathological diagnoses.