Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Risk of pedestrian collision for persons with peripheral field loss: A computational analysis
Nish Mohith Kurukuti1,2,3, Sailaja Manda1, Eli Peli1
1Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Collisions between pedestrians with peripheral field loss and others are rare, occurring mainly when the individual with vision loss overtakes from behind. Assistive aids should monitor higher bearing angles to prevent these incidents.
Area of Science:
- Vision science
- Human-computer interaction
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Peripheral field loss, such as homonymous hemianopia, can lead to pedestrian collisions.
- Previous models simplified pedestrians as points and did not account for the vision of non-impaired pedestrians in collision avoidance.
- Understanding collision risk in real-world scenarios requires considering pedestrians as volumetric entities with and without vision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend collision risk models for individuals with homonymous hemianopia by simulating pedestrians as volumetric entities.
- To characterize the collision risk posed by normally sighted pedestrians to those with homonymous hemianopia.
- To compare collision risks using point vs. volumetric pedestrian models, with and without vision.
Main Methods:
- Simulated approaching pedestrians as volumetric entities without vision, volumetric entities with vision, and as points.
- Generated spatial collision risk maps and densities based on bearing and radial distances.
- Analyzed collision scenarios involving individuals with homonymous hemianopia and normally sighted pedestrians.
Main Results:
- Volumetric pedestrian models showed slightly different collision risks compared to point models.
- Normal vision in the non-impaired pedestrian significantly reduced collision risk by enabling detection and avoidance.
- Remaining collision risks were concentrated at higher bearing angles (>50°) and closer radial distances (<2 m), primarily when overtaking.
Conclusions:
- Collisions are infrequent and occur when individuals with peripheral field loss overtake pedestrians from behind at higher speeds.
- Higher bearing angles represent a critical zone for potential collisions, necessitating monitoring by assistive aids.
- Findings are applicable to various peripheral field loss conditions, including monocular vision loss and conditions like retinitis pigmentosa and glaucoma.
More Related Videos
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
10:52Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
Published on: April 13, 2016