Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Considering information-sharing motives to reduce misinformation
1Affective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Psychology, New York University, NY, NY, USA.
Abstract:
Misinformation has risen in recent years, negatively affecting domains ranging from politics to health. To curb the spread of misinformation it is useful to consider why, how, and when people decide to share information. Here we suggest that information-sharing decisions are value-based choices, in which sharers strive to maximize rewards and minimize losses to themselves and/or others. These outcomes can be tangible, in the form of monetary rewards or losses, or intangible, in the form of social feedback. On social media platforms these rewards and losses are not clearly tied to the accuracy of information shared. Thus, sharers have little incentive to avoid disseminating misinformation. Based on this framework, we propose ways to nudge sharers to prioritize accuracy during information-sharing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Groupthink
Confirmation Biases
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...

