Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.3K
Enhancement of joint flanker effect in intergroup competition
Yang Zhao1, Xucong Hu1, Jifan Zhou1
1Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Psych Journal
|August 22, 2024
Summary
Intergroup competition enhances the joint flanker effect, a measure of social cognition. This effect is linked to perceptions of group closeness, not just competition itself.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Group Dynamics
Background:
- Successful social interaction relies on representing a partner's mental state.
- Within-group representations are well-studied, but the impact of intergroup interactions remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how intergroup interactions influence the joint flanker effect.
- To explore the role of group entitativity and competition in shaping social cognition.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments using the joint flanker task.
- Manipulation of intergroup competition and group entitativity (group closeness).
Main Results:
- Intergroup competition significantly increased the joint flanker effect.
- Competition between individuals from different groups did not show the same enhancement.
- Higher perceived group entitativity led to a larger joint flanker effect.
Conclusions:
- Beliefs about group closeness are crucial for understanding how intergroup competition affects social cognition.
- This study offers a novel perspective on the interplay between within-group representations and intergroup dynamics.
Keywords:
group competitiongroup entitativityjoint flanker effectshared representationsocial interactionMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:04Social Facilitation
31.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.9K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
01:37Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
01:21Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
170
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
170
01:21Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
3.4K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
3.4K