Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

06:50
A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
2.5K
Longitudinal evaluation of manufacturer-specific differences for high-sensitive CRP EQA results
Nathalie Weiss1, Laura Vierbaum1, Marcel Kremser1
1INSTAND e.V., Society for Promoting Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratories e.V., Duesseldorf, Germany.
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
|August 23, 2024
Summary
High-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) assay harmonization has improved, reducing differences to below 20%. However, assay variations may still lead to misclassification of cardiovascular disease risk in patients.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Analysis
- Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment
Background:
- C-reactive protein (CRP) is a key biomarker for inflammation and tissue injury.
- High-sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) is increasingly used for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and monitoring.
- Controversial results in meta-analyses highlight the need to assess hs-CRP assay harmonization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current status of hs-CRP assay harmonization globally.
- To assess manufacturer-specific differences in hs-CRP measurements.
- To consider clinical decision limits for CVD risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 17 international external quality assessment (EQA) surveys (2018-2023).
- Inclusion of 2 blinded samples per EQA survey.
- Manufacturer-based approach considering clinical decision limits and result scatter.
Main Results:
- Assay harmonization has improved, with median differences decreasing from 50% to below 20%.
- Coefficient of variation dropped below 10% after a change to single-donor samples.
- Significant assay differences persist, potentially leading to disparate patient classifications.
Conclusions:
- A positive trend towards hs-CRP assay harmonization is observed.
- Meta-analyses should stratify results by assay to account for manufacturer differences.
- Traceability to different international standards may hinder future harmonization efforts.
Keywords:
cardiovascular diseasesexternal quality assessment scheme (EQA)harmonizationhsCRPproficiency testing (PT)
