Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy and cost-effectiveness of rapid-prototyped dental models
Naveen K Subbaiah1, Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari1, Ritu Duggal1
1Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 New Delhi, India.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the dental models 3D printed in vertical and horizontal orientation as compared to the conventional plaster and digital models.
Methods:
This study involved scanning 50 plaster models using Maestro 3D Desktop Scanner (AGE Solutions, Pisa, Italy). The STL file obtained from the scanner was processed and three-dimensionally (3D) printed in the horizontal and vertical orientation using a PolyJet 3D printer (Objet 30 prime, Stratasys Ltd., Eden Prairie, Minnesota, United States). The accuracy of the rapid-prototyped (3D printed) models was measured from the pre-determined landmarks and was compared among the groups. In addition, determining the cost-effectiveness of the 3D printed models in different orientations was based on the amount of material (resin) utilized during the 3D printing process. ANOVA was used to determine the accuracy of the models.
Results:
There were statistically insignificant differences (P>0.05) among rapid-prototyped models (≤0.06mm) compared to plaster models and digital models for the linear measurements made in all three planes of space. The dental models printed in the horizontal orientation were found to be more cost-effective than those printed in a vertical orientation in terms of the amount of material (resin) utilized and printing time during the 3D printing process.
Conclusions:
The accuracy of rapid-prototyped models 3D printed in the horizontal and vertical orientations was comparable to the plaster models and digital models for clinical applications. Horizontally printed models were more cost-effective than vertically printed models.
