Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

10:39
Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology
Published on: December 7, 2011
15.1K
Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry
Auryan Szalat1, Harold Rosen2, William D Leslie3
1Osteoporosis Center, Internal Medicine Ward, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Summary
Assessing bone mineral density (BMD) changes using non-contiguous vertebrae in lumbar spine DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) is as precise as using contiguous vertebrae. This finding supports clinical use of non-contiguous vertebrae for monitoring osteoporosis treatment.
Area of Science:
- Osteoporosis research
- Bone densitometry
- Clinical diagnostics
Background:
- Clinically meaningful bone mineral density (BMD) changes on repeat DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) must exceed the 95% least significant change (LSC).
- Lumbar spine DXA often omits vertebrae with artifacts, necessitating measurements from non-contiguous vertebrae.
- Previous concerns suggested lower precision with non-contiguous versus contiguous vertebrae.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare least significant change (LSC) and BMD response to osteoporosis medication between non-contiguous and contiguous lumbar spine vertebrae.
- To evaluate the clinical utility of non-contiguous vertebrae in DXA scans.
Main Methods:
- Calculated LSCs for lumbar spine DXA using 879 scan-pairs from the Manitoba BMD Program.
- Compared BMD changes from contiguous and non-contiguous vertebrae in 11,722 patients with two DXA examinations.
- Analyzed BMD changes in relation to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use.
Main Results:
- Least significant changes (LSCs) were comparable between contiguous and non-contiguous vertebrae.
- High correlations (Pearson r≥ 0.9) were observed between BMD changes from L1-L4 and all combinations of vertebrae.
- Similar percentage changes in spine BMD and treatment-concordant changes exceeding LSC were found for both contiguous and non-contiguous vertebrae.
Conclusions:
- Lumbar spine BMD changes can be reliably assessed using 2 or 3 non-contiguous vertebrae when necessary.
- Precision using non-contiguous vertebrae is similar to that of contiguous vertebrae.
- Non-contiguous vertebrae effectively detect treatment-concordant BMD changes comparable to contiguous vertebrae.

