Anatomical navigational difficulties in transradial right carotid artery stenting with 7-F Optimo balloon guide

Kei Arakawa1, Kei Harada1, Masahito Kajihara1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital, Fukuoka-city, Japan.

Insights

Navigating the 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) for right carotid artery stenting via the radial artery can be challenging. Specific subclavian artery angles and heights predict these difficulties, aiding procedural planning.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a key treatment for carotid artery stenosis.
  • Transradial access using a 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) is a viable approach for CAS.
  • Predicting navigational challenges is crucial for procedural success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate factors influencing the difficulty of navigating the 7-F Optimo BGC from the right radial artery to the right common carotid artery during CAS.
  • To identify anatomical predictors of navigational difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 40 CAS procedures using a 7-F Optimo BGC via the right radial artery.
  • Assessment of pre-operative anatomical measurements, including subclavian artery (SA) height and SA-to-common carotid artery (CCA) angle.
  • Comparison of anatomical parameters between groups with easy and difficult BGC navigation.

Main Results:

  • Successful BGC navigation in all cases, with difficulties in 17.5% (7/40).
  • Difficult navigation was associated with a greater SA height (>34 mm) and a smaller SA-CCA angle (<30°).
  • SA height >34 mm and SA-CCA angle <30° demonstrated high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (82%) for predicting navigation difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Transradial CAS with a 7-F Optimo BGC is a safe procedure for right carotid artery stenosis.
  • Pre-procedural assessment of SA height and SA-CCA angle can predict BGC navigational challenges.
  • Identifying these anatomical risk factors can optimize procedural planning and potentially reduce complications.
Abstract