Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Determination of Aggregate Surface Morphology at the Interfacial Transition Zone ITZ
Published on: December 16, 2019
A Comparative Study on the Texture of Exposed Aggregate Concrete (EAC) Pavements Using Different Measurement
Pawel Gierasimiuk1, Marta Wasilewska1, Wladyslaw Gardziejczyk1
1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E Street, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Assessing aggregate concrete (EAC) surface texture reveals microtexture (BPT, DFT) and macrotexture (CTM, SPL) measurement differences. DFT showed less track sensitivity than BPT, while MPD/MTD showed high correlation despite differing measurement methods.
Area of Science:
- Civil Engineering
- Materials Science
- Transportation Engineering
Background:
- Surface texture is crucial for pavement performance and safety.
- Evaluating texture of exposed aggregate concrete (EAC) presents unique challenges.
- Standardized methods are needed for reliable texture assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare various methods for assessing EAC surface texture.
- To analyze microtexture and macrotexture measurement discrepancies.
- To evaluate the correlation between different texture measurement techniques.
Main Methods:
- Microtexture assessed using British Pendulum Tester (BPT) and Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT).
- Macrotexture evaluated with Circular Texture Meter (CTM), Stationary Laser Profilograph (SPL), and volumetric method.
- Measurements conducted on expressway test sections, including left/right wheel tracks.
Main Results:
- DFT was less sensitive to microtexture variations between tracks than BPT.
- MPD and MTD values showed no significant differences between tracks.
- High linear correlation observed between BPN and DFT20 (r=0.719), and MPD and MTD (r>0.900).
- Differences in MPD from CTM and SPL were acceptable, attributed to profile scanning parameters.
- Models for Mean Texture Depth (MTD/ETD) differed significantly between EAC and asphalt surfaces.
Conclusions:
- While BPT and DFT show variations in microtexture sensitivity, MPD and MTD correlate well.
- Laser profilometers (CTM, SPL) provide comparable macrotexture data for EAC.
- Existing MTD/ETD models require adaptation for EAC pavements.
Related Concept Videos
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
The pressure method,...
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change

