Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

08:21
Laser-induced Forward Transfer for Flip-chip Packaging of Single Dies
Published on: March 20, 2015
12.4K
A Review on Soft Error Correcting Techniques of Aerospace-Grade Static RAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Arrays.
Weihang Wang1, Xuewu Li1, Lei Chen2
1Beijing Microelectronics Technology Institute, Beijing 100076, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 29, 2024
Summary
This study addresses soft errors in aerospace FPGAs by analyzing sensitivity to improve repair efficiency. Targeted detection and correction of soft errors enhance the reliability of space-based FPGAs.
Area of Science:
- Aerospace Engineering
- Computer Architecture
- Reliability Engineering
Background:
- Aerospace-grade SRAM-based FPGAs are vulnerable to single event effects causing soft errors.
- Increasing FPGA complexity exacerbates the challenge of correcting these soft errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose soft error sensitivity analysis for FPGAs to enhance soft error repair efficiency.
- To review methods for analyzing soft error sensitivity in FPGA resources and configuration bitstreams.
Main Methods:
- Reviewing soft error sensitivity analysis methods for FPGA application layer resources.
- Reviewing soft error sensitivity analysis methods for FPGA configuration bitstreams.
- Discussing application layer memory scrubbing and configuration scrubbing techniques.
Main Results:
- Sensitivity analysis can identify critical areas in FPGAs susceptible to soft errors.
- Targeted scrubbing techniques based on sensitivity analysis improve error correction efficiency.
- Emerging technologies offer future directions for robust FPGA reliability.
Conclusions:
- Soft error sensitivity analysis is crucial for efficient soft error mitigation in FPGAs.
- Implementing targeted detection and correction strategies enhances the reliability of aerospace FPGAs.
- Continued research into novel mitigation technologies is vital for future space applications.
Related Concept Videos
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
7.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy
9.4K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
9.4K

