Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Incremental Value of Multidomain Risk Factors for Dementia Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach
Wei Ying Tan1, Carol Anne Hargreaves2, Gavin S Dawe3
1Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (WYT, SH), National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Objective:
The current evidence regarding how different predictor domains contributes to predicting incident dementia remains unclear. This study aims to assess the incremental value of five predictor domains when added to a simple dementia risk prediction model (DRPM) for predicting incident dementia in older adults.
Design:
Population-based, prospective cohort study.
Setting:
UK Biobank study.
Participants:
Individuals aged 60 or older without dementia.
Measurements:
Fifty-five dementia-related predictors were gathered and categorized into clinical and medical history, questionnaire, cognition, polygenetic risk, and neuroimaging domains. Incident dementia (all-cause) and the subtypes, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), were determined through hospital and death registries. Ensemble machine learning (ML) DRPMs were employed for prediction. The incremental values of risk predictors were assessed using the percent change in Area Under the Curve (∆AUC%) and the net reclassification index (NRI).
Results:
The simple DRPM which included age, body mass index, sex, education, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, depression, smoking, and alcohol consumption yielded an AUC of 0.711 (± 0.008 SD). The five predictor domains exhibited varying levels of incremental value over the basic model when predicting all-cause dementia and the two subtypes. Neuroimaging markers provided the highest incremental value in predicting all-cause dementia (∆AUC% +9.6%) and AD (∆AUC% +16.5%) while clinical and medical history data performed the best at predicting VaD (∆AUC% +12.2%). Combining clinical and medical history, and questionnaire data synergistically enhanced ML DRPM performance.
Conclusion:
Combining predictors from different domains generally results in better predictive performance. Selecting predictors involves trade-offs, and while neuroimaging markers can significantly enhance predictive accuracy, they may pose challenges in terms of cost or accessibility.
Related Concept Videos
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

