Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Competition02:34

Competition

21.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.5K
Hybrid Zones02:29

Hybrid Zones

16.9K
Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.
16.9K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

13.1K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.1K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

19.2K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.2K
What is a Species?01:17

What is a Species?

43.9K
Overview
43.9K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.1K
Overview
21.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Too Few, Too Many, or Just Right? Optimizing Sample Sizes for Population-Level Inferences in Animal Tracking Projects.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Dynamic Lake Ice Conditions Shape Caribou Water-Crossing Behavior in the Arctic.

Global change biology·2026
Same author

How animal movement influences wildlife-vehicle collision risk: A mathematical framework for range-resident species.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same author

How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Vegetation pattern formation induced by local growth outpacing susceptibility to non-local competition.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same author

Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: Range vs. occurrence distributions.

Ecology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

18.8K

Intraspecific encounters can lead to reduced range overlap.

William F Fagan1, Ananke Krishnan2, Qianru Liao2

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. bfagan@umd.edu.

Movement Ecology
|August 30, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Close encounters between animals can lead to significant shifts in their home ranges. This study analyzed movement data to show how direct interactions influence animal spatial behavior and range distribution.

Keywords:
Canis latransUrsus arctos horribilisContinuous-time movement modelingGPS tracking dataPerceptual rangeSpatial overlap

More Related Videos

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.0K
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
04:10

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

18.8K
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.0K
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
04:10

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Animal Movement Ecology
  • Spatial Ecology

Background:

  • Direct intraspecific encounters are increasingly studied with advancements in animal movement data.
  • Statistical tools now allow linking direct encounters to long-term consequences on space use.
  • Understanding these interactions is crucial for comprehending animal social dynamics and resource competition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if close intraspecific encounters correlate with spatial shifts in animal range distributions.
  • To determine if animals alter their space use to avoid conflict following direct encounters.
  • To test hypotheses regarding the population-level spatial consequences of intraspecific encounters.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of detailed movement data for coyotes (Canis latrans) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis).
  • Pairwise analysis of movement data to identify behavioral changes after close encounters.
  • Population-level hypothesis testing on spatial shifts in range distributions following encounters.

Main Results:

  • A detailed case study of coyotes showed altered home range overlap following a close intraspecific encounter.
  • Grizzly bear data supported hypotheses that encounters are associated with subsequent changes in range distribution overlap.
  • Finer spatial scale encounters resulted in greater subsequent changes in animal space use.

Conclusions:

  • Animals can exhibit long-term, large-scale spatial changes in response to potentially conflict-generating direct encounters.
  • Pairwise movement data analysis can identify critical proximity distances that alter animal behavior.
  • Direct encounters play a significant role in shaping individual and population-level space use patterns.