Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients in the ICU
Chuanlin Zhang1, Jie Mi1,2, Xueqin Wang1
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.
Insights
A new prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients was developed. This ICU-VTE model identifies eight risk factors and demonstrates higher accuracy than existing tools for predicting VTE.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiovascular Research
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
- Current guidelines recommend VTE risk assessment for all ICU patients.
- Existing risk assessment tools lack specific validation for the ICU population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify independent risk factors for VTE in ICU patients.
- To develop and validate a novel risk assessment model for VTE in the ICU setting.
- To compare the predictive accuracy of the new model against existing tools.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 566 mixed ICU patients (June 2018 - October 2022).
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent VTE risk factors.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess predictive accuracy.
Main Results:
- VTE occurred in 15.7% of patients; 62.9% were asymptomatic.
- The ICU-VTE prediction model includes eight risk factors (e.g., history of VTE, immobilization, age).
- The ICU-VTE model showed superior predictive accuracy (AUC=0.838) compared to other tools (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Eight independent risk factors for VTE in ICU patients were identified.
- A new ICU-VTE risk assessment model was developed with higher predictive accuracy.
- External validation via a prospective study is recommended for clinical implementation.
Background:
ICU patients have a high incidence of VTE. The American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic practice guidelines recommend assessing the risk of VTE in all ICU patients. Although several VTE risk assessment tools exist to evaluate the risk factors among hospitalized patients, there is no validated tool specifically for assessing the risk of VTE in ICU patients.
Methods:
A retrospective corhort study was conducted between June 2018 and October 2022. We obtained data from the electronic medical records of patients with a variety of diagnoses admitted to a mixed ICU. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of VTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the predictive accuracy of different tools.
Results:
A total of 566 patients were included, and VTE occurred in 89 patients (15.7%), 62.9% was asymptomatic VTE. A prediction model (the ICU-VTE prediction model) was derived from the independent risk factors identified using multivariate analysis. The ICU-VTE prediction model included eight independent risk factors: history of VTE (3 points), immobilization ≥4 days (3 points), multiple trauma (3 points), age ≥70 years (2 points), platelet count >250 × 103/μL (2 points), central venous catheterization (1 point), invasive mechanical ventilation (1 point), and respiratory failure or heart failure (1 point). Patients with a score of 0-4 points had a low (1.81%) risk of VTE. Patients were at intermediate risk, scoring 5-6 points, and the overall incidence of VTE in the intermediate-risk category was 17.1% (odds ratio [OR], 11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-29.4). Those with a score ≥7 points had a high (44.1%) risk of VTE (OR, 42.6; 95% CI, 16.4-110.3). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ICU-VTE prediction model was 0.838, and the differences in the AUCs were statistically significant between the ICU-VTE prediction model and the other three tools (ICU-VTE score, Z = 3.723, P < 0.001; Caprini risk assessment model, Z = 6.212, P < 0.001; Padua prediction score, Z = 7.120, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
We identified eight independent risk factors for acquired VTE among hospitalized patients in the ICU, deriving a new ICU-VTE risk assessment model. The model aims to predict asymptomatic VTE in ICU patients. The new model has higher predictive accuracy than the current tools. A prospective study is required for external validation of the tool and risk stratification in ICU patients.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

