Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence

Area of Science:

• Rehabilitation technology
• Bioethics
• Artificial Intelligence

Background:

• Robotics and AI are transforming care and integration for individuals with disabilities, fostering independence and social participation.
• Bioethical considerations are crucial at anthropological, ethical, legal, and socio-political levels.
• Current debates show a lack of consensus on assistive robots, with a primary focus on product usability over ethical implications.

Purpose of the Study:

• To conduct a bioethical analysis of embodied artificial intelligence (AI) in disability care.
• To identify potential risks associated with a functionalist model of AI implementation.
• To emphasize the need for an ethical framework addressing social and moral implications.

Main Methods:

• Bioethical analysis of embodied AI in assistive technology.
• Examination of the functionalist model in AI application for disability.
• Review of ethical arguments and socio-political implications.

Main Results:

• Using embodied AI based on a functionalist model risks devaluing intrinsic human dignity.
• Failure to acknowledge disability as a complex interplay of factors can harm individuals.
• There is a significant risk of discrimination in accessing novel assistive technologies.

Conclusions:

• An ethical approach is essential for implementing embodied AI in rehabilitation.
• Addressing the social and moral implications of AI is critical to prevent harm and discrimination.
• Prioritizing ethical considerations alongside usability is vital for responsible innovation in assistive technology.