The Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Prosthodontic Education: A Systematic Review

Area of Science:

• Dental Education
• Medical Education Technology

Background:

• Traditional learning methods are standard in prosthodontic education.
• Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) offers potential new pedagogical approaches.
• Assessing the comparative effectiveness of TEL versus traditional methods is crucial for educational advancement.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) with traditional learning methods in prosthodontic education.
• To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TEL in prosthodontics.
• To evaluate the impact of various TEL approaches on student learning outcomes.

Main Methods:

• A systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEL and traditional learning in prosthodontic education was conducted.
• Studies were screened, data extracted, and risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2).
• Educational outcomes were evaluated using Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model.

Main Results:

• Fourteen RCTs were included, with most judged at high risk of bias or having concerns.
• TEL approaches like e-learning, blended learning, and virtual reality simulation were assessed for short-term benefits.
• While practical skills outcomes were often comparable to traditional learning, theoretical knowledge acquisition showed contradictory results. Virtual reality simulation showed promise for clinical skills.

Conclusions:

• There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the widespread adoption of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in prosthodontic education.
• Virtual reality simulation appears to be a promising TEL approach for enhancing practical clinical skills in prosthodontics.
• Further rigorous research is needed to definitively establish the benefits of TEL in this field.