Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
What does work in school first aid? The impact of innovative teaching methodologies and resources for children aged 3
Santiago Martínez-Isasi1, Carlos Berlanga-Macías2, José Alberto Martínez-Hortelano2
1Facultad de enfermería, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain; CLINURSID Research Group, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain; Simulation, Life Support and Intensive Care Research Unit of Santiago de Compostela (SICRUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain; Intervenciones de atención primaria para prevenir enfermedades crónicas maternoinfantiles de origen perinatal y del desarrollo (RICORS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, RD21/0012/0025, Madrid; Red española de investigación en salud materna, neonatal, infantil y del desarrollo (RICORS-SAMID, RD24/0013/0023), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Introduction:
The lack of evidence, which would serve as a structure for a legal framework for the implementation of first aid (FA) training in the school setting, justifies this systematic review. The aim was to analyze the effectiveness of learning methods in improving FA knowledge and skills in children aged 3-12 years.
Patients And Methods:
Systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. The risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The probability of acquiring knowledge in each of the outcomes was analyzed through relative risks, which were calculated for each different type of training methodology as an estimate of effect size (ES). We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects method to calculate pooled ES estimates with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
Six studies, with 1038 schoolchildren from 5 to 12 years, were included. The targeted knowledge areas included emergency recognition and call, quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, foreign body airway obstruction, injury, or bleeding. The ES for innovative training on emergency call (correct information), compared to control group, was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.10-1.47). On emergency call, compared to traditional training, it was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.08-1.28).
Conclusions:
Innovative methodologies appeared to be equally or more effective than traditional training in teaching FA to schoolchildren aged 3-12 years, especially with age-appropriate resources. Still, the heterogeneity of the applied methodologies and the lack of robust evidence call for further studies which could elucidate the identified gaps in knowledge.