Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Patient-clinician interactions in shared diabetes/nephrology consultations - A qualitative observation study
Leah Sejrup Christensen1, Eithne Hayes Bauer2,3,4, Jette Primdahl4,5,6
1Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Background:
The incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations.
Aim:
This project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting.
Research Methods:
We performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease.
Results:
We found one over-arching theme: 'A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease' and four subthemes: (1) 'The medical focal point' pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) 'The possibility of negotiations' illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) 'Speaking different languages' displayed how patients used alternative illness-based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) 'Perceptions of everyday life' concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives.
Conclusion:
Patients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings.
Short Phrases:
Shared Outpatient Clinic, Patient-clinician interactions.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

