Medical Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Patients With Systolic Heart Failure
Daniel Sykora1, Melanie Bratcher2, Robert Churchill3
1Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education.
Insights
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization improves cardiac remodeling and outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This suggests GDMT is crucial for managing CS-related HFrEF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Immunology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can lead to systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]).
- The effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in CS patients with HFrEF is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of GDMT optimization on cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with CS and HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 881 patients evaluated for CS.
- Included 79 patients with diagnosed CS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, and follow-up echocardiogram.
- Assessed GDMT using Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score and immunosuppressive treatment.
Main Results:
- GDMT agents increased from a mean of 1.7 to 2.2, and KCMO score improved from 31.8 to 70.1.
- Mean LVEF improved significantly from 30.9% to 39.9%.
- Improved LVEF correlated with higher follow-up KCMO scores; event-free survival was better with higher KCMO scores.
Conclusions:
- Optimization of GDMT is linked to improved cardiac remodeling and better clinical outcomes in CS patients with HFrEF.
- GDMT optimization, rather than immunosuppressive treatment alone, appears to be a key factor in managing these patients.
Background:
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may result in systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]), but its response to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains uncertain.
Methods And Results:
We investigated 881 patients evaluated for CS to identify those with diagnosed CS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at diagnosis, and follow-up echocardiogram within 11-24 months. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT as quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score, and immunosuppressive treatment were recorded. The primary outcome was a composite of event-free survival (unplanned heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular assist device [LVAD]/heart transplant, or death). Seventy-nine (9%) CS patients met the inclusion criteria (35% female, median age 57 years, mean LVEF 30.9%, median New York Heart Association class II [46%], mean number of GDMT agents 1.7, and mean KCMO score 31.8). Most (87%) were treated with immunosuppressive treatment. At follow-up (median 16 months), the mean number of GDMT agents increased to 2.2 (P=0.02), and the mean KCMO score to 70.1 (P<0.001). Mean LVEF improved to 39.9% (excluding LVAD/transplant; P<0.001) and the change in LVEF was correlated with follow-up KCMO score (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 13 (16%) patients and differed by KCMO score (log-rank P<0.001), but not by immunosuppressive treatment (log-rank P=0.36).
Conclusions:
GDMT optimization is associated with better cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes in CS patients with HFrEF.
More Related Videos
09:11Cell-based Therapy for Heart Failure in Rat: Double Thoracotomy for Myocardial Infarction and Epicardial Implantation of Cells and Biomatrix
Published on: September 22, 2014
02:47Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
