Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Assessment of Kidney Function in Mouse Models of Glomerular Disease
Published on: June 30, 2018
Transcriptome meta-analysis and validation to discovery of hub genes and pathways in focal and segmental
Amir Roointan1,2, Maryam Ghaeidamini1, Parvin Yavari1
1Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jerib Avenue, Isfahan, 81746-73461, Iran.
Background:
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a histologic pattern of injury in the glomerulus, is one of the leading glomerular causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Despite extensive research, the underlying biological alterations causing FSGS remain poorly understood. Studying variations in gene expression profiles offers a promising approach to gaining a comprehensive understanding of FSGS molecular pathogenicity and identifying key elements as potential therapeutic targets. This work is a meta-analysis of gene expression profiles from glomerular samples of FSGS patients. The main aims of this study are to establish a consensus list of differentially expressed genes in FSGS, validate these findings, understand the disease's pathogenicity, and identify novel therapeutic targets.
Methods:
After a thorough search in the GEO database and subsequent quality control assessments, seven gene expression datasets were selected for the meta-analysis: GSE47183 (GPL14663), GSE47183 (GPL11670), GSE99340, GSE108109, GSE121233, GSE129973, and GSE104948. The random effect size method was applied to identify differentially expressed genes (meta-DEGs), which were then used to construct a regulatory network (STRING, MiRTarBase, and TRRUST) and perform various pathway enrichment analyses. The expression levels of several meta-DEGs, specifically ADAMTS1, PF4, EGR1, and EGF, known as angiogenesis regulators, were analyzed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
Results:
The identified 2,898 meta-DEGs, including 665 downregulated and 669 upregulated genes, were subjected to various analyses. A co-regulatory network comprising 2,859 DEGs, 2,688 microRNAs (miRNAs), and 374 transcription factors (TFs) was constructed, and the top molecules in the network were identified based on degree centrality. Part of the pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant disruption in the angiogenesis regulatory pathways in the FSGS kidney. The RT-qPCR results confirmed an imbalance in angiogenesis pathways by demonstrating the differential expression levels of ADAMTS1 and EGR1, two key angiogenesis regulators, in the FSGS condition.
Conclusion:
In addition to presenting a consensus list of differentially expressed genes in FSGS, this meta-analysis identified significant distortions in angiogenesis-related pathways and factors in the FSGS kidney. Targeting these factors may offer a viable strategy to impede the progression of FSGS.
