Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.3K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.3K
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment01:17

Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment

62
Renal dysfunction significantly impairs the renal clearance of drugs, leading to potential complications in drug therapy. Renal failure, which can be caused by various factors, poses a significant challenge in the elimination of drugs from the body.
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
62
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.7K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures as Quality Metrics of Health Care Quality in Patients Receiving Dialysis.

Advances in kidney disease and health·2025
Same author

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of an Innovative Workshop to Teach Primary Palliative Care Communication Skills to Fourth-Year Medical Students.

The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2025
Same author

Measuring Symptoms Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies for Incorporation Into Kidney Care.

Seminars in nephrology·2024
Same author

Medication Adherence Among Patients With Kidney Disease: An Umbrella Review.

Advances in kidney disease and health·2024
Same author

Dialysis decision-making process by Chinese American patients at an urban, academic medical center: a retrospective chart review.

BMC palliative care·2024
Same author

Patient Perspectives on Clotting in the Extracorporeal Circuit and Decision-Making Regarding Anticoagulation Therapy.

Seminars in nephrology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

4.2K

Evaluating Medical Devices in Nephrology Using Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures.

Amanda Grandinetti1, Michelle M Richardson2

  • 1College of Health and Human Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.

Seminars in Nephrology
|September 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Patient involvement in medical device development is crucial for better healthcare. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient preference information (PPI) are key to improving devices for kidney disease patients.

Keywords:
Medical devicepatient preference informationpatient-reported outcomeregulatory decision-making

More Related Videos

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
08:50

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Published on: June 16, 2014

16.2K
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

57.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

4.2K
Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
08:50

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Published on: June 16, 2014

16.2K
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

57.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical device development
  • Patient-centric evaluation
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Patient perspective integration is vital for medical device development.
  • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), patient preference information (PPI), and qualitative inquiry amplify the patient's voice.
  • Nephrology has seen limited use of PROs, PPI, and qualitative inquiry in device development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of patient involvement in medical device development.
  • To address the sparse utilization of patient-centric methodologies in nephrology.
  • To emphasize the need for exploring the impact of devices on patient well-being.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing patient-centric methodologies like PROs and PPI.
  • Analysis of current trends and FDA guidance in nephrology device development.
  • Identification of unique considerations for regulatory decision-making using PROs and PPI.

Main Results:

  • Patient-centric evaluation is paramount for effective medical devices.
  • Limited use of PROs, PPI, and qualitative inquiry in nephrology device development leaves patient impact unexplored.
  • Forward-thinking programs and FDA guidance are promoting PROs in nephrology.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-centric initiatives are rapidly evolving in nephrology.
  • Ensuring medical devices meet the needs of people with kidney disease is essential.
  • Improved quality of care is achievable through patient involvement in device development.