Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

07:56
Drawing and Hydrophobicity-patterning Long Polydimethylsiloxane Silicone Filaments
Published on: January 7, 2019
8.9K
Filament Disturbance and Fusion during Embedded 3D Printing of Silicones
Leanne M Friedrich1, Jeremiah W Woodcock1
1Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
|September 5, 2024
Summary
Controlling defects in embedded 3D printing (EMB3D) requires balancing support fluid rheology and interfacial tension. Overextruding material is crucial for interfilament fusion, especially with viscous supports and low interfacial tension.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Additive Manufacturing
- Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Embedded 3D printing (EMB3D) fabricates soft materials using a yield stress fluid support bath.
- Lack of filament fusion is a key defect in EMB3D due to support fluid displacement.
- Interfacial tension has been explored to enhance fusion but can also cause filament rupture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of interfacial tension in controlling defects during embedded 3D printing.
- To investigate the impact of support rheology, interfacial tension, print speed, and spacing on filament fusion and defects.
- To understand the interplay between capillary instabilities and material properties in EMB3D.
Main Methods:
- Utilized polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based inks with varying silica and surfactant content.
- Printed parallel filaments into Laponite-in-water support baths.
- Employed digital image analysis to quantify filament shrinkage, rupture, fusion, and positioning defects.
Main Results:
- Capillary instabilities and interfilament fusion are governed by the balance between support rheology and interfacial tension.
- Lower support viscosity and higher interfacial tension increase filament shrinkage and rupture.
- Achieving interfilament fusion necessitates material overextrusion, particularly in high-viscosity supports and low interfacial tension conditions.
- Printing orientation significantly impacts fusion quality and filament displacement.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing embedded 3D printing requires careful management of interfacial tension and support rheology.
- Material overextrusion is essential for robust interfilament fusion.
- Specialized slicing algorithms are needed to account for orientation-dependent spacing and achieve precise control in EMB3D.

