Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated HER2 Scoring with Uncertainty Quantification Using Lensfree Holography and Deep Learning.

BME frontiers·2026
Same author

Snapshot 3D image projection using a diffractive decoder.

Light, science & applications·2026
Same author

Autonomous Uncertainty Quantification for Computational Point-of-Care Sensors.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Universal and transferable attacks on pathology foundation models using microscopic perturbations.

Light, science & applications·2026
Same author

Super-resolution image projection over an extended depth of field using a diffractive decoder.

Light, science & applications·2026
Same author

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of <i>ex vivo</i> human brain tumors using quantitative oblique back-illumination microscopy (qOBM).

Biomedical optics express·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Anatomically Inspired Three-dimensional Micro-tissue Engineered Neural Networks for Nervous System Reconstruction, Modulation, and Modeling
10:45

Anatomically Inspired Three-dimensional Micro-tissue Engineered Neural Networks for Nervous System Reconstruction, Modulation, and Modeling

Published on: May 31, 2017

13.1K

Neural network-based processing and reconstruction of compromised biophotonic image data.

Michael John Fanous1, Paloma Casteleiro Costa1, Çağatay Işıl1,2,3

  • 1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Light, Science & Applications
|September 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers are using deep learning (AI) to improve biophotonic imaging by intentionally degrading some metrics and compensating with AI. This strategy enhances imaging speed, reduces cost, and improves form-factor for advanced bioimaging applications.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers
08:41

Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers

Published on: March 23, 2017

9.3K
A Method for 3D Reconstruction and Virtual Reality Analysis of Glial and Neuronal Cells
12:49

A Method for 3D Reconstruction and Virtual Reality Analysis of Glial and Neuronal Cells

Published on: September 28, 2019

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Anatomically Inspired Three-dimensional Micro-tissue Engineered Neural Networks for Nervous System Reconstruction, Modulation, and Modeling
10:45

Anatomically Inspired Three-dimensional Micro-tissue Engineered Neural Networks for Nervous System Reconstruction, Modulation, and Modeling

Published on: May 31, 2017

13.1K
Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers
08:41

Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers

Published on: March 23, 2017

9.3K
A Method for 3D Reconstruction and Virtual Reality Analysis of Glial and Neuronal Cells
12:49

A Method for 3D Reconstruction and Virtual Reality Analysis of Glial and Neuronal Cells

Published on: September 28, 2019

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biophotonics and Imaging
  • Deep Learning in Biological Sciences
  • Computational Imaging

Background:

  • Deep learning integration with biophotonic setups is revolutionizing bioimaging.
  • A key trend involves intentionally compromising measurement metrics (e.g., PSF, SNR) to improve cost, speed, and form-factor.
  • Deep learning models compensate for these compromises using extensive ideal data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review measurement aspects intentionally impaired in biophotonic setups.
  • To explore how deep learning compensates for these impairments.
  • To highlight the enhancement of parameters like field of view (FOV) and depth of field (DOF).

Main Methods:

  • Deliberate degradation of metrics such as point spread function (PSF), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sampling density, and pixel resolution.
  • Application of deep learning networks for defect compensation.
  • Training deep learning models on large datasets of ideal or superior imaging data.

Main Results:

  • Successful recuperation of compromised metrics (PSF, SNR, etc.) through deep learning.
  • Enhancement of other crucial imaging parameters, including field of view (FOV), depth of field (DOF), and space-bandwidth product (SBP).
  • Demonstration of improved imaging speed, reduced cost, and simplified hardware.

Conclusions:

  • The strategic compromise of certain biophotonic metrics, coupled with deep learning compensation, offers significant advantages in bioimaging.
  • This approach enhances imaging speed, reduces cost and hardware complexity, making advanced imaging more accessible.
  • Future research should focus on novel ways to balance hardware compromises with AI-driven compensation for advanced biophotonic applications.