Self-control and behavioral public policy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Wilhelm Hofmann1, Sonja Grelle2, Kristian Steensen Nielsen3
1Department of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Bochum, Marburg.
Abstract:
How everyday self-control conflicts are resolved can have significant long-term personal and societal consequences, as readily illustrated by obesity, smoking, and unsustainable consumption. Here, we delineate connections between current self-control research and policymaking. We first discuss the achievements and shortcomings of the prevailing individual-level focus in self-control research. Next, we propose a multilevel perspective that incorporates structural factors operating at the micro, meso, and macro levels as the root cause of many issues framed as self-control problems. We then introduce a comprehensive framework (4LP) synthesizing four key levers for public policymaking. We conclude that future policy research may benefit from closer, interdisciplinary collaboration to better represent the complex interplay between individual agency and structural factors regarding self-control outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

