Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed?

J Wardrope, P M Chennells

    British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Routine radiologist reporting on casualty radiographs minimally impacted patient management, altering treatment in only 1.1% of cases. Key findings highlight specific anatomical areas where errors were more common.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is it cost effective to introduce paramedic practitioners for older people to the ambulance service? Results of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2009
    Same author

    Soft tissue injuries: principles of biomechanics, physiotherapy and imaging.

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2008
    Same author

    Introduction of non-transport guidelines into an ambulance service: a retrospective review.

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2007
    Same author

    Risk factors for psychological distress following injury.

    The British journal of clinical psychology·2006
    Same author

    Targets and moving goal posts: changes in waiting times in a UK emergency department.

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2005
    Same author

    ATLS: past, present, and future.

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2004

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Patient Management

    Background:

    • Casualty departments frequently utilize radiographs for patient diagnosis.
    • The impact of radiologists' interpretations on clinical decision-making requires evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the influence of routine radiologist reporting on casualty radiographs.
    • To identify the frequency and clinical significance of errors in casualty doctor interpretations.
    • To determine which anatomical areas are most prone to overlooked lesions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of casualty radiographs and associated reports.
    • Calculation of error prevalence by casualty doctors.
    • Introduction of a severity score to categorize lesion importance.
    • Analysis of how radiologist reports altered patient management.

    Main Results:

    • Overall error prevalence by casualty doctors was 6.2%, with many errors being trivial.
    • Radiologist reports significantly altered patient management in only 1.1% of cases.
    • Radiographs of the chest, face, skull, and wrist showed the greatest impact on management.
    • Reports on extremities like fingers, hands, and toes seldom altered treatment.

    Conclusions:

    • Routine radiologist reporting has a limited but specific impact on patient management in casualty settings.
    • Identifying high-risk anatomical areas can help target quality improvement initiatives.
    • The clinical significance of radiograph interpretation errors varies considerably by anatomical location.

    Related Experiment Videos