Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
The relationship between corticospinal excitability and structural integrity in stroke patients
Lina Daghsen1,2, Thomas Checkouri1,2, Aymric Wittwer2,3
1Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
Evaluating corticospinal tract (CST) integrity and function in acute stroke (<7 days) is key for motor recovery prediction. A significant lesion load predicts absent motor evoked potentials (MEPs), while MEP-positive patients show a bimodal structure-function relationship.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Predicting motor recovery after stroke is crucial for patient management.
- The corticospinal tract (CST) is vital for motor function, but its structure-function relationship in acute stroke remains unclear.
- Previous studies show inconsistent findings regarding CST integrity and functional recovery post-stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the structure-function relationship of the CST in the acute phase of stroke (<7 days).
- To explore the predictive value of CST integrity and excitability for upper extremity motor recovery.
Main Methods:
- Seventy acute ischemic stroke patients with unilateral upper extremity weakness were enrolled.
- Multimodal assessment included clinical severity (UE Fugl Meyer), CST lesion load via MRI, and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude via transcranial magnetic stimulation.
- Data were analyzed cross-sectionally and longitudinally to assess recovery at 3 months.
Main Results:
- A CST lesion load exceeding 87% accurately predicted the absence of MEPs (80.4% accuracy).
- In MEP-positive patients, a bimodal CST structure-function relationship was observed: linear for small MEP amplitudes (<0.703 mV) and non-linear for larger amplitudes.
- MEP amplitude independently predicted recovery in patients with MEPs <0.703 mV, but not in those with MEPs ≥0.703 mV. No predictors were identified for MEP-negative patients.
Conclusions:
- This study proposes a paradigm shift in understanding MEP-positive stroke phenotypes.
- It refines the link between CST structural integrity and neurophysiological function in acute stroke.
- Findings have implications for designing future stroke recovery studies and improving prognostic accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

