Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

06:26
Author Spotlight: Exploring Breathing Techniques and Digital Solutions for Enhancing Running Performance
Published on: September 27, 2024
407
Self-Paced Field Running Test in Monitoring Fatigue and Training Adaptations in Recreational Runners
Olli-Pekka Nuuttila1,2, Arja Uusitalo3,4, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen1
1Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
|September 7, 2024
Summary
The self-paced field running test (SFT) is a reproducible method for assessing endurance performance in recreational runners. However, its sensitivity to detect small, short-term performance changes may be limited, potentially requiring more standardized conditions.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Running Performance Analysis
Background:
- Endurance performance monitoring is crucial for training.
- Field-based tests offer accessibility but require validation.
- The self-paced field running test (SFT) is a novel approach to assess endurance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reproducibility of the SFT in recreational runners.
- To assess the sensitivity of the SFT in detecting changes in endurance performance.
- To compare SFT performance with established incremental treadmill tests.
Main Methods:
- 27 recreational runners underwent a 6-week training intervention (baseline, overload, recovery).
- Participants completed weekly SFTs and periodic incremental treadmill and 3000-m running tests.
- Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation, and repeated-measures correlation.
Main Results:
- Significant associations (r = .68–.93) were found between SFT speeds and incremental test metrics (peak and lactate threshold speeds).
- High intraclass correlations (.77–.96) indicated good reproducibility, especially for interval speeds.
- Repeated-measures correlations showed significant, albeit small, associations for submaximal and maximal efforts.
Conclusions:
- The SFT demonstrates good reproducibility for estimating endurance performance in recreational runners.
- The test's sensitivity to track minor, short-term performance fluctuations appears limited.
- Standardized conditions may enhance the SFT's ability to detect subtle performance changes.

