Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

73.9K
Overview
73.9K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

4.7K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
4.7K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

45
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
45

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anatomy of a global surgeon: A qualitative study on global surgery career experiences across specialties.

Surgery·2026
Same author

Medical Student Knowledge, Perspectives, and Interest in Global Surgery: A Scoping Review.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

The Impact of Imposter Phenomenon on Residents in Surgical Specialties:A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same author

Female Sexual Function and Dysfunction.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2025
Same author

Exploring Psychosocial Burdens of Diabetes in Pregnancy and the Feasibility of Technology-Based Support: Qualitative Study.

JMIR diabetes·2025
Same author

The Ouroboros Threat.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.7K

Why Moral Bioenhancement Cannot Reliably Produce Virtue.

Gina Lebkuecher1, Marley Hornewer2, Maya V Roytman3

  • 1Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|September 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Moral bioenhancement aims to improve virtuous traits but cannot reliably produce virtue. Virtue ethics highlights that moral bioenhancement risks undermining the motivational, rational, and behavioral components of true virtue.

Keywords:
enhancementmoral theoryneuroethicsvirtues

More Related Videos

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

21.3K
Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish
08:00

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: October 27, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.7K
Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

21.3K
Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish
08:00

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: October 27, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • * Philosophy of technology
  • * Neuroethics
  • * Virtue ethics

Background:

  • * Moral bioenhancement (MBE) proposes enhancing morally desirable emotions and dispositions.
  • * Some scholars suggest MBE could foster virtue, but this claim requires scrutiny within ethical frameworks.
  • * Existing technologies for MBE raise questions about their efficacy and ethical implications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To evaluate whether moral bioenhancement can reliably produce virtue from a virtue ethics perspective.
  • * To identify the inherent moral risks associated with pursuing MBE within virtue ethics.
  • * To analyze the compatibility of current MBE technologies with the core components of virtue.

Main Methods:

  • * Analysis of virtue ethics, focusing on its core components: motivational, rational, and behavioral.
  • * Examination of existing moral bioenhancement technologies and their capabilities.
  • * Argumentative synthesis of virtue ethics principles with MBE's potential impact.

Main Results:

  • * Moral bioenhancement cannot reliably produce virtue because it fails to consistently meet the motivational, rational, and behavioral criteria of virtue ethics.
  • * Existing MBE technologies do not adequately address the nuanced requirements for cultivating genuine virtue.
  • * The pursuit of MBE introduces significant moral risks within a virtue ethics framework.

Conclusions:

  • * From a virtue ethics standpoint, moral bioenhancement is unlikely to cultivate genuine virtue.
  • * The application of current MBE technologies poses risks that may undermine the development of virtuous character.
  • * Further research is needed to reconcile technological advancements with the philosophical underpinnings of virtue ethics.