Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Misspecified Cramér-Rao lower bound with Poisson statistics and its application in localization microscopy.

Optics letters·2025

Same author

To label or not: the need for validation in label-free imaging.

Journal of biomedical optics·2024

Same author

Low-Frequency Coherent Raman Imaging Robust to Optical Scattering.

Chemical & biomedical imaging·2024

Same author

Phylogenetic analysis of Acanthamoeba isolated from soil samples and nasal cavities of patients with malignancy: a public health concern in the northwest of Iran.

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene·2024

Same author

Super-resolution computational saturated absorption microscopy.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2023

Same author

Fisher information and the Cramér-Rao lower bound in single-pixel localization microscopy with spatiotemporally modulated illumination.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2023

Same journal

Fluorescence properties of collagen types I-V: a comprehensive study of spectral and lifetime characteristics.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Same journal

Spectral dependence of lipofuscin fluorescence lifetimes revealed by FLIM with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Same journal

Building the future of biophotonics through experiential education and seasonal schools.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Same journal

Time-of-flight fluorescence depth mapping using a spatiotemporal deep learning model.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Same journal

Erratum: Color-filter-array-based multispectral photoplethysmography optical sensor and its motion artifact correction algorithm (Erratum).

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Same journal

Real-time fidelity assessment of fluorescence molecular imaging without reference images.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Published on: April 19, 2019

Statistical estimation theory detection limits for label-free imaging.

Lang Wang¹, Maxine Varughese^1,2, Ali Pezeshki²

¹Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.

Journal of Biomedical Optics

|September 9, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study unifies label-free microscopy techniques, comparing their detection sensitivities using statistical estimation theory. A new framework guides optimal experimental design for non-invasive biomedical imaging.

Keywords:

coherent Raman label-free microscopy nonlinear microscopy photothermal quantitative phase transient absorption

More Related Videos

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Published on: November 5, 2017

Label-Free Imaging of Single Proteins Secreted from Living Cells via iSCAT Microscopy

Label-Free Imaging of Single Proteins Secreted from Living Cells via iSCAT Microscopy

Published on: November 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Published on: April 19, 2019

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Published on: November 5, 2017

Label-Free Imaging of Single Proteins Secreted from Living Cells via iSCAT Microscopy

Label-Free Imaging of Single Proteins Secreted from Living Cells via iSCAT Microscopy

Published on: November 20, 2018

Area of Science:

Biomedical Optics
Microscopy
Statistical Physics

Background:

Label-free microscopy enables non-invasive visualization of cellular and tissue structures.
Understanding the benefits, drawbacks, and sensitivities of diverse label-free methods remains challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a unified framework for evaluating signal detection bounds in label-free microscopy.
To compare the detection sensitivities of various label-free optical interactions.

Main Methods:

Introduced a comprehensive framework for signal detection bounds in label-free microscopy.
Developed a general model for optical scattering-induced signal generation.
Quantitatively analyzed information using Fisher information and Cramér-Rao lower bound.

Main Results:

Established a unified theoretical framework for assessing label-free microscopy techniques.
Provided quantitative analysis of information content and estimation precision.
Identified fundamental constraints for optimal experimental design.

Conclusions:

Offers valuable insights for researchers utilizing label-free techniques.
Guides optimal experimental design and interpretation for non-invasive imaging.
Facilitates advancements in biomedical research and clinical practice.