Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Comparing Deep Learning Performance for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Cell Segmentation in Brightfield Microscopy
Markéta Vašinková1, Vít Doleží1, Michal Vašinek1
1Department of Computer Science, FEECS, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Accurate cell detection in low-contrast microscopy images is crucial for cell studies. U-net++ with ResNeSt-269 excelled in segmenting chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, highlighting the need for method selection based on specific cell morphology features.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Imaging
- Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Accurate cell detection in low-contrast brightfield microscopy images is challenging.
- Automatic cell detection is vital for quantitative cell morphology and migration studies.
- State-of-the-art image segmentation methods are required for precise cell boundary detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare eight advanced neural network architectures for segmenting cells in low-contrast brightfield microscopy images.
- To identify the optimal deep learning model for detecting and segmenting chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells.
- To assess the impact of different segmentation methods on the analysis of cellular morphological features.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of eight neural network architectures (U-net, U-net++, PAN, MAN, LinkNet, FPN, DeepLabV3, DeepLabV3+) for image segmentation.
- Training networks for 1000 epochs using PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning.
- Utilizing watershed algorithm and three-class semantic segmentation for instance segmentation.
- Employing StarDist, a deep learning tool for object detection.
Main Results:
- U-net++ architecture with a ResNeSt-269 backbone achieved the highest Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.8902 for semantic segmentation.
- Statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed in mean cell characteristics (area, circularity, solidity, perimeter, radius, shape index) across different segmentation methods.
- While algorithms showed overall agreement with ground truth, distinct methods prioritized different morphological features.
Conclusions:
- The optimal choice of cell segmentation method depends on the specific application and the cellular traits under investigation.
- U-net++ demonstrates superior performance for semantic segmentation of CLL cells in this context.
- Different segmentation approaches can influence the quantitative analysis of cell morphology, necessitating careful method selection.
More Related Videos
08:58Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
Published on: November 19, 2018
09:31Automated Quantification of Hematopoietic Cell – Stromal Cell Interactions in Histological Images of Undecalcified Bone
Published on: April 8, 2015