Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Addressing Systemic Inequities: An Evaluation of the Resilience Catalysts in Public Health Program
Wendy Ellis1, Kristen Hayes, Esmeralda Salas
1Author Affiliations: Department of Global Health (Drs Ellis and Chen), Resilience Catalysts in Public Health (Ms Hayes), Center for Community Resilience, George Washington University School of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia; Population Health Innovation Lab (Ms Salas and Dr Bultema), Public Health Institute, Oakland, California; and National Association of County and City Health Officials (Ms Gousse), Washington, District of Columbia.
The Resilience Catalysts (RC) process equips local health departments to address health inequities and build community resilience. This evaluation highlights RC
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Equity
- Community Resilience
Background:
- Resilience Catalysts (RC) is a program supporting local health departments (LHDs) in operationalizing the Community Health Strategist (CHS) role.
- RC aims to foster equity and community resilience through multi-sector policy, practice, and program changes.
- The program provides a structured process and technical assistance (TA) to LHDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify essential elements of the RC process and TA that enable LHDs to address systemic drivers of adversity and inequity.
- To expand understanding of RC's preliminary impact on theory, practice, and funding in the post-COVID era.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods evaluation utilizing online surveys and semi-structured interviews.
- Framework analysis, constant comparison analysis, and descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis.
- The study included 12 diverse US cities and counties, with 29 survey and 33 interview participants.
Main Results:
- Evaluation outcomes show enhanced community engagement and expansion of system-level thinking among LHDs.
- RC demonstrated success in advancing health and racial equity, clarifying the RC process, and building capacity for the CHS role.
- Participants reported increased knowledge and skills to address root causes of adversity and inequity.
Conclusions:
- The RC process effectively prepared LHDs to operationalize the CHS role by building essential knowledge and skills.
- RC facilitates understanding of adversity's root causes, addresses structural racism in public health, and supports collaborative action planning.
- The findings have implications for public health practice, theory, and funding strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Restorative Care

