Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment
Stephen Morris1, Holly Walton2, Amy Simpson3
1Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. sm2428@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Patients, carers, and healthcare professionals desire improved care coordination for rare diseases. Key preferences include appointment costs, health record access, and specialist support, with differing views on care coordinator autonomy.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Patient Experience
- Rare Disease Management
Background:
- Coordination of care for rare diseases is often suboptimal.
- Understanding patient, carer, and healthcare professional preferences is crucial for improving care coordination.
- Rare diseases affect a significant population requiring tailored healthcare approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine patient, parent/carer, and healthcare professional preferences for care coordination attributes in rare diseases.
- To identify key factors influencing service design for better rare disease care coordination.
- To inform policy and practice regarding coordinated care for individuals with rare conditions.
Main Methods:
- A discrete choice experiment was employed using online surveys.
- Participants included patients, carers, and healthcare professionals across the UK.
- Choice scenarios evaluated preferences for cost, record access, expertise, care coordinator role, specialist access, and emergency plans.
Main Results:
- All evaluated attributes significantly influenced preferences for care coordination services.
- Patients and carers showed similar preferences, prioritizing greater autonomy in care coordination.
- Healthcare professionals differed, preferring more autonomous care coordinators and formal emergency plans.
Conclusions:
- Individuals with rare diseases highly value coordinated care, aligning with policy objectives.
- Specific attributes like cost, access to records and expertise, and emergency planning are critical for service improvement.
- Addressing differing preferences between patients/carers and professionals can optimize rare disease care coordination.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Cochran's Q Test