Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Assessment of noise pollution-prone areas using an explainable geospatial artificial intelligence approach
Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh1, Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki1, X Angela Yao2
1Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, XR Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
This research aims to use the power of geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), employing the categorical boosting (CatBoost) machine learning model in conjunction with two metaheuristic algorithms, the firefly algorithm (CatBoost-FA) and the fruit fly optimization algorithm (CatBoost-FOA), to spatially assess and map noise pollution prone areas in Tehran city, Iran. To spatially model areas susceptible to noise pollution, we established a comprehensive spatial database encompassing data for the annual average Leq (equivalent continuous sound level) from 2019 to 2022. This database was enriched with critical spatial criteria influencing noise pollution, including urban land use, traffic volume, population density, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Our study evaluated the predictive accuracy of these models using key performance metrics, including root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indices. The results demonstrated the superior performance of the CatBoost-FA algorithm, with RMSE and MAE values of 0.159 and 0.114 for the training data and 0.437 and 0.371 for the test data, outperforming both the CatBoost-FOA and CatBoost models. ROC analysis further confirmed the efficacy of the models, achieving an accuracy of 0.897, CatBoost-FOA with an accuracy of 0.871, and CatBoost with an accuracy of 0.846, highlighting their robust modeling capabilities. Additionally, we employed an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach, utilizing the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) method to interpret the underlying mechanisms of our models. The SHAP results revealed the significant influence of various factors on noise-pollution-prone areas, with airport, commercial, and administrative zones emerging as pivotal contributors.
More Related Videos
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Manipulation and Analysis
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Introduction to GIS
Levels of Use of a GIS
Thematic Layering in GIS