The French hypertrophic cardiomyopathy gene register: A systematic large gene screening for hypertrophic

Albert Hagège1, Tania Puscas2, Mohamed El Hachmi3

  • 1AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Cardiology, Paris, France; AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Centre de Référence des Cardiomyopathies et des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires ou Rares, Paris, France; Université de Paris, INSERM U 970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre, Paris, France, Paris, France.

PubMed

Insights

Systematic genetic screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is effective, identifying variants in nearly 40% of patients. Broader gene panels improve diagnostic yield, particularly for non-sarcomeric causes like Fabry disease and TTR amyloidosis.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Genetics
  • Medical Genetics
  • Genomic Medicine

Background:

  • Systematic genetic screening is recommended for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), though optimal strategies remain debated.
  • The GEREMY registry evaluated the performance of genetic screening in a French HCM cohort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the diagnostic yield and performance of systematic genetic screening panels for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
  • To identify the prevalence of genetic variants, including sarcomeric and non-sarcomeric causes, in an adult HCM cohort.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective observational study of 748 adult HCM patients.
  • Initial screening used a 12-gene panel, including GLA (Fabry disease) and TTR (transthyretin) genes.
  • Larger gene panels (17-80 genes) were employed for patients with initially negative results or specific clinical profiles.

Main Results:

  • Pathogenic variants were identified in 39.6% of patients, primarily in sarcomeric genes (MYBPC3, MYH7).
  • Non-sarcomeric genes, including TTR and GLA, accounted for 8.8% and 3.0% of positive cases, respectively, often identified by larger panels.
  • Screening performance was significantly higher in patients under 40 years and those with a family history of HCM.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic genetic screening, even with limited panels, demonstrates good performance for HCM diagnosis.
  • Larger gene panels increase diagnostic yield, identifying crucial non-sarcomeric conditions like Fabry disease and TTR amyloidosis.
  • A significant proportion of patients benefit from expanded genetic testing, revealing variants missed by initial approaches.
Abstract