Cannulated compression screws with cable technique leads to a dramatic reduction in patella fracture fixation...

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes between cannulated compression screw with cable construct (CS) and tension band wiring (TBW) in transverse patella fractures.

A retrospective study was conducted on patients surgically treated for AO/OTA 34C1 or 34C2 transverse patella fractures with CS or TBW technique between January 2019 and January 2023. Clinical outcomes included complications related to the implant, wound and fracture at 6 months and 1 year, time to achieving full weight bearing status and early perioperative clinical outcomes. Radiological outcomes included the time to fracture heals and delayed union. Functional outcome measures using the Oxford Knee Scale, 36-short form questionnaire and the Bartlett Anterior Knee Score were assessed.

73 patients were treated with CS (n = 33) or TBW (n = 40). TBW had higher complication rates: 25.0% (n = 10) required implant removal, 12.5% (n = 5) had wire breakage, 12.5% (n = 5) experienced fracture displacement while 52.5% (n = 21) experienced implant migration. In contrast, no CS patients had implant removals, wire breakage or fracture displacement and 3.0% (n = 1) experienced implant migration. At 1 day post-operatively, 87.9% (n = 29) CS group patients were able to ambulate as compared to the 55.0% (n = 22) of TBW patients. Furthermore, CS patients ambulated further distances at 11.8 ± 10.6 m than the TBW group (6.4 ± 7.4 m). The CS group (25.9 ± 24.6 days) also achieved full weight bearing status faster than the TBW group (43.6 ± 39.4 days). The time taken for the fracture to heal and functional outcomes were comparable among the two groups.

The CS technique demonstrated lower complications, in particular, no CS patient had implant removals, wire migration or fracture displacement. Additionally, CS technique showed a faster return to ambulation and time to achieving full weight bearing status.