Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
New learning technique based on real-time kinematic feedback from an inertial sensor for manual therapy in shoulder
Manuel Trinidad-Fernández1,2, Francisco González-Molina2, Cristina Roldán-Jiménez1,2
1Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Background:
Reducing teacher subjectivity and checking skill corrections have an impact on the manual therapy learning, one of the most crucial components of physical therapy clinical practise. The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness of a kinematic real-time feedback strategy (KRTF) with an inertial sensor as a new methodology for the learning of glenohumeral joint mobilisation, comparing it with the traditional teaching method.
Methods:
This study was a randomised trial. 59 undergraduate students without experience in manual therapy were randomised into two different groups (G1: Traditional methods group; G2: KRTF group). G1: students would practice the technique while an expert in manual therapy would supervise them. G2: could perform the mobilisation and observe the kinematic characteristics of the technique on a laptop. For the two movements that compose the mobilisation (angulation and translation), the result variables extracted were: maximum displacement, minimum displacement, area under the curve and the difference between the area under the curve of angulation and translation. In addition, the consistency of the measurement and reliability were calculated, too.
Results:
Some significant differences were observed within groups, between groups and in the group x time interaction, the difference between the angulation and translation area. The synchronization of the movements in in the post comparison was better in G2 because the differences in the areas of both movements were significantly smaller (Mean Difference G1 vs. G2 = 1111.4°s (p > 0.05)).
Conclusions:
After comparing the kinematic variables recorded between the two intervention groups analysed in the present study, we observed that the kinematic registers were significantly different between the two groups, with a higher evolution in the KRTF group compared to the traditional learning method. The effectiveness of KRTF was proved over the traditional teaching methods in facilitating the learning process of the glenohumeral joint mobilisation.
Gov Id:
NCT02504710, 22/07/2015.
