Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Speech rate and associations in predictive sentence processing.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024
Same author

Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?

Journal of cognition·2023
Same author

Links between Daytime Napping, Night-Time Sleep Quality and Infant Attention: An Eye-Tracking, Actigraphy and Parent-Report Study.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Online mouse cursor trajectories distinguish phonological activation by linguistic and nonlinguistic sounds.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.1K

Mouse cursor trajectories capture the flexible adaptivity of predictive sentence processing.

Anuenue Kukona1, Nabil Hasshim2

  • 1School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary

People rationally adapt predictions during sentence processing. They disengaged predictions when cues were unreliable and adapted them when cues were reliably disconfirmed, supporting rational theories.

More Related Videos

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
06:15

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism

Published on: October 3, 2018

7.7K
Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.1K
Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
06:15

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism

Published on: October 3, 2018

7.7K
Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Sentence Processing

Background:

  • Sentence processing involves predictive mechanisms.
  • The rational adaptivity of these predictions is debated.
  • Verb-based semantic cues influence prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how reliably verb-based semantic cues affect prediction adaptivity during sentence processing.
  • To test whether comprehenders rationally adjust their predictions based on cue reliability.
  • To explore the role of cognitive control in prediction adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Two mouse cursor tracking experiments with 85 participants each.
  • Manipulation of verb-based cue reliability (predictive, nonpredictive, antipredictive sentences).
  • Measurement of predictive mouse cursor movements to targets versus distractors.

Main Results:

  • Participants flexibly adapted predictions based on cue reliability.
  • Prediction disengagement occurred with unreliable cues (Experiment 1).
  • Adapted predictions were generated with reliably disconfirmed cues (Experiment 2).
  • No significant link was found between prediction adaptation and individual differences in cognitive control.

Conclusions:

  • Comprehenders rationally adapt their predictions during sentence processing.
  • Findings support theoretical approaches emphasizing rational adaptation in psycholinguistics.
  • The study highlights the dynamic nature of predictive processing in language comprehension.