A Qualitative Study Defining Perspectives on Rurality and Surgery From Midwestern Medical Schools

Rural general surgery faces a crisis as more surgeons undergo fellowship training and then practice in metropolitan areas, leaving rural Americans with decreasing surgical care. This study aims to identify how hometown rurality affects medical students' current level of knowledge and potential educational gaps within their understanding of the definition, benefits, and challenges of rural general surgery to define the need for enhanced education within medical schools.

In Spring 2021, 11 Midwestern medical schools participated in an electronic survey. Participants were divided into three groups (rural, urban, or suburban) based on their hometown rurality using Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Qualitative analysis was performed for three questions addressing the definition, benefits, and challenges of rural surgery.

Responses were analyzed from 411 students whose hometowns were representative of 33 states. The majority of respondents were female (n = 260; 63.4%) and Caucasian (n = 230; 56.9%) from self-reported suburban backgrounds who grew up and remained in the Midwest for their education. Major themes identified across all students were defining rural surgery as "Rural"/"Farmland"/"Nowhere" and specified the challenges of rural surgery to be relating to funding, facilities, and/or technology. Benefits identified were breadth of surgical procedures and community engagement.

Most students do not understand the concept of rurality by definition or Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. However, students were able to identify a broad range of challenges and benefits faced by rural surgeons today. This provides a foundational needs assessment to drive future educational efforts to increase exposure to and knowledge of rural general surgery.