Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Factors Influencing Robotic Surgery Adoption in the United States
Bryant Morocho1, Dev Patel2, Ponnandai Somasundar3
1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Roger Williams Surgery and Cancer Outcomes Research and Equity (RWSCORE) Center, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Introduction:
Robotic surgery has expanded rapidly in the United States despite high financial commitments of a robotic surgery program. Factors that drive uneven robotic surgery adoption has not been adequately explored at the populational level.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed using the National Cancer Database to evaluate facility-level adoption of robotic colorectal surgery. Facilities were stratified by the timing of the first robotic colorectal case into adoption quartiles (1st: earliest to 4th: latest) and nonadopters. A multivariable ordinal logistic regression model with mixed-methods approach with clustering at the facility level was performed to evaluate the association between the timing of robotic surgery adoption and region, institution-type, and patient socioeconomic demographic variables.
Results:
A total of 1182 facilities were identified as robotic surgery adopters between 2010 and 2021. Early adopting facilities were more likely to be academic facilities (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.24-0.47) that treated high-income patients (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.94) with access to insurance (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.81). Early adopting facilities were less likely to treat patients from urban (OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69) and rural regions (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.78) compared to metropolitan areas.
Conclusions:
Robotic colorectal surgery adoption is influenced by academic status of the facility and socioeconomic make-up of patients treated at the facility. Ensuring equitable access to advanced surgical technology remains an essential systems-level priority to reduce differences in surgical care delivery.

