Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Combining Solid-state and Solution-based Techniques: Synthesis and Reactivity of ChalcogenidoplumbatesII or IV
Published on: December 29, 2016
Chemical Bonding in [Fe(η4-P4)2]2- and Related Complexes
Chengxiang Ding1, Sudip Pan1, Gernot Frenking2,3,4
1Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China.
Abstract:
Quantum chemical calculations of the six valence isoelectronic complexes [FeL2]2-, [CoL2]-, and NiL2 with L = η4-P4, η4-C4H4 using density functional theory have been carried out. The molecular structures were investigated with a variety of methods. The analysis of the electronic structure in [Fe(η4-P4)2]2- shows that the bonding situation is very similar to valence isoelectronic Ni(η4-C4H4)2. The orbital interactions in the 18 electron complexes [TML2]q (TMq = Fe2-, Co-, Ni) come mainly from TM(dπ)→L2 backdonation, enhanced by smaller contributions from TM(dδ)→L2 backdonation and TM(s)←L2 donation. Calculations of the six TML2 species indicate that all of them are viable candidates for synthetic work. The bonding situation is very similar and can straightforwardly be explained with the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson bonding model in terms of dative bonding between d10 metal atoms and the ligands in the electronic singlet state. EDA-NOCV calculations using the ligands and the metal atoms with different charges and electronic states indicate that the metal-ligand bonds in the charged complexes [FeL2]2- and [CoL2]- are best described with fragments in the electronic triplet state between the metal atoms with d8 configuration and triplet ligands. The singlet fragments give the degenerate TM(dπ)→L2 π backdonation as the strongest component, whereas the triplet fragments have the related electron-sharing TMq (dπ)-(L2)2- π bonding as the major component, differing only by the assignment of the bonded two electrons to one or both fragments. The calculations of the charge distribution using the Hirshfeld and Voronoi partitioning methods suggest that the metal atoms are nearly neutral or carry small negative charges in all complexes. The NBO method gives erratic charges, because of the neglect of the 4p AOs of the transition metals as genuine valence orbitals.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...

