Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Particle Image Velocimetry Investigation of Hemodynamics via Aortic Phantom
Published on: February 25, 2022
Balanced steady-state free precession phase contrast at 0.55T applied to aortic flow
Jie Xiang1, Rajiv Ramasawmy2, Felicia Seemann2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Background:
There is a growing interest in the development and application of mid-field (0.55T) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), including flow imaging. However, aortic flow imaging at 0.55T has limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially in diastolic phases where there is reduced inflow-driven contrast for spoiled gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences. The low SNR can limit the accuracy of flow and regurgitant fraction measurements.
Methods:
In this work, we developed a two-dimensional phase contrast (PC) acquisition with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP), termed PC-SSFP, for flow imaging and quantification at 0.55T. This PC-SSFP approach precisely nulls the zeroth and first gradient moments at both the echo time (TE) and repetition time, except for the flow-encoded acquisition, for which the first gradient moment at the TE is determined by the velocity encoding. Our proposed sequence was tested in both phantoms and in healthy volunteers (n = 11), to measure aortic flow. In volunteers, both a breath-hold (bh) and a free-breathing (fb) protocol, with averaging to increase SNR, were obtained. Total flow, peak flow, cardiac output, and SNR were compared for PC-SSFP and PC-GRE. Stroke volumes were also measured and compared to planimetry method.
Results:
In a phantom, SNR was significantly higher using PC-SSFP compared to PC-GRE (25.5 ± 9.6 vs 8.2 ± 2.9), and the velocity measurements agreed well (R = 1.00). In healthy subjects, for both bh and fb protocols, PC-SSFP measured accurate peak flow (fb: R = 0.99, bh: R = 0.96) and cardiac output (fb: R = 0.98, bh: R = 0.88), compared to PC-GRE, accurate stroke volume (fb: R = 0.94, bh: R = 0.97), compared to planimetry measurement, and offered constant high SNR (fb: 28 ± 9 vs 18 ± 6, bh: 24 ± 7 vs 11 ± 3) over the cardiac cycle in 11 subjects.
Conclusion:
PC-SSFP is a more reliable evaluation tool for aortic flow quantification, when compared to the conventional PC-GRE method at 0.55T, providing higher SNR, and thus potentially more accurate flows.
Related Concept Videos
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes
Steady Flow of a Fluid Stream
During this process, the momentum of the fluid within the control volume remains constant over the time interval dt. By applying the...
Velocity and Acceleration in Steady and Unsteady Flow
The acceleration can be generalized to any point in the flow, and expressed as components along three perpendicular directions, representing changes in velocity over...

