Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
A framework for understanding selection bias in real-world healthcare data
Ritoban Kundu1, Xu Shi1, Jean Morrison1
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Researchers can now use administrative patient data for studies. This paper introduces methods to address selection bias in Electronic Health Records (EHR) research, improving data accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Administrative patient-care data, including Electronic Health Records (EHR) and claims data, are increasingly utilized in population-based research.
- Large sample sizes in such research can lead to minimal standard errors, necessitating attention to biases that persist regardless of sample size, such as selection bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an analytic framework using directed acyclic graphs to dissect selection bias in research using administrative health data.
- To introduce and evaluate four weighting approaches for mitigating selection bias in the estimation of associations between outcomes and exposures.
- To provide practical guidance and tools for applied researchers working with complex health datasets.
Main Methods:
- Utilized directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to conceptualize and analyze sources of selection bias.
- Developed and described four distinct weighting methodologies designed to reduce selection bias.
- Conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of the proposed weighting methods.
- Applied the methods to real-world Electronic Health Records (EHR) data from a longitudinal biorepository to examine the association between cancer and biological sex.
Main Results:
- The directed acyclic graph (DAG) framework effectively guides the dissection of selection bias in EHR research.
- Simulation studies demonstrated the practical utility of the proposed weighting approaches under specific conditions.
- Comparison of methods using real-world EHR data provided insights into their performance in practice.
- Annotated R code is provided for implementing the discussed weighting methods and associated statistical inference.
Conclusions:
- Selection bias is a critical consideration in population-based research using administrative health data.
- The proposed analytic framework and weighting methods offer practical solutions for addressing selection bias.
- The availability of R code facilitates the application of these techniques in future research, enhancing the reliability of findings from EHR data.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

