Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Efficacy of Modern Therapies for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Specific Population Subgroups: A
Carlo Lavalle1, Marco Valerio Mariani1, Paolo Severino1
1Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiologist and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Introduction:
The efficacy and safety of emerging therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have never been compared in specific subgroups of patients.
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE libraries were used to extract data. We used the following keywords: (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction OR HFrEF) AND (treatment OR therapy) OR (cardiovascular death) OR (hospitalization for heart failure). We compared randomized clinical trials for HFrEF emerging therapies focusing on the elderly (patients >65 years old and >75 years old), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min), patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary heart disease (CAD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, women, patients on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V). The primary outcome was the efficacy composite endpoint of cardiovascular death (CVD) and HF hospitalization (HFH).
Results:
S/V significantly reduced the primary outcome in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94) and with CKD (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90); dapagliflozin in patients >65 (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86) and >75 years old (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53-0.87), in those with CKD (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59-0.88), DM (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.89), and CAD (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92); empagliflozin in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), those with DM (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86), CAD (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99), women (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), and in patients on S/V (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45-0.91); vericiguat in patients with CKD (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and NYHA class III/IV (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.98); omecamtiv mecarbil in patients with CAD (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and NYHA III/IV (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.97).
Conclusion:
Emerging HFrEF therapies show a clinical benefit with the reduction of the primary composite endpoint of CVD and HFH, with each drug being more effective in specific patient population.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents