Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016
Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood
Sergey N Vorobyev1, Yuri Kolesnichenko1, Jan Karlsson2
1BIO-GEO-CLIM Laboratory, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
Arctic rivers, especially their floodplains, are significant carbon sources. Floodplain lakes and secondary channels emit more CO2 than the main river stem, highlighting the need to include high water levels in global carbon emission assessments.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Climate Science
- Geochemistry
Background:
- Arctic rivers play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle, acting as a positive feedback mechanism in climate warming.
- The contribution of extensive floodplains, temporary water bodies, and secondary channels to carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange in Arctic rivers remains understudied compared to main stems and tributaries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the relative contribution of various water bodies within the Arctic Ob River basin to the carbon cycle.
- To assess the impact of floodplain features like secondary channels and lakes on carbon emissions during the spring flood period.
Main Methods:
- Field measurements of hydrochemical variables and greenhouse gases (GHG) concentrations and fluxes across a 900 km transect of the Lower Ob River floodplain during peak spring flood.
- Analysis of CO2 and methane (CH4) fluxes using chamber methods.
- Statistical analysis of multi-parametric data.
- Utilizing Landsat-8 satellite imagery to determine floodplain water coverage.
Main Results:
- Floodplain lakes and secondary channels are significant contributors to carbon emissions, exceeding the flux from the main stem and tributaries.
- Terrestrial organic matter-rich flooded wetlands (fens) increase CO2 emissions, while groundwater discharge sites in secondary channels reduce them.
- CO2 emissions from Lower Ob River floodplain water surfaces during spring flood were 0.73 ± 0.25 Tg C, with floodplain lakes contributing 59% and the main stem 34%.
- Diffuse CH4 flux was less than 1% of the total carbon flux.
- Floodplain water coverage reached 30% during spring flood, significantly higher than baseflow conditions (18%).
Conclusions:
- Carbon emissions from Arctic rivers can be underestimated by at least three times if measurements are solely based on summer low-flow conditions.
- Accurate assessment of global riverine carbon emissions requires accounting for extended water surfaces and associated emissions during high water levels, particularly in Arctic river floodplains.
- The study emphasizes the critical role of floodplain dynamics in the Arctic carbon cycle and its implications for climate feedback mechanisms.
More Related Videos
12:50Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
09:03Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
Published on: September 6, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
The Calvin Benson Cycle
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Global Climate Change
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
The Carbon Cycle