Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

72
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
72
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

86
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
86
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A practical review of response-adaptive randomization: Under-explored challenges and potential directions.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

AI for evidence-based treatment recommendation in oncology: a blinded evaluation of large language models and agentic workflows.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

Efficient randomized adaptive designs for multi-arm clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Interconnections of Multimorbidity-Related Clinical Outcomes: Analysis of Health Administrative Claims Data With a Dynamic Network Approach.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Statistical inference on the relative risk following covariate-adaptive randomization.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Response-Adaptive Randomization Procedure in Clinical Trials with Surrogate Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Group Response-Adaptive Randomization With Delayed and Missing Responses.

Guannan Zhai1, Yang Li2, Lixin Zhang3,4

  • 1Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new group response-adaptive randomization (RAR) method for clinical trials, improving practicality by updating assignments based on group responses rather than individual ones. The novel design maintains theoretical properties and performs well with delayed or missing data.

Keywords:
asymptotic propertiesclinical trialdoubly adaptive biased coin designefficientgroup enrollmentsequential design

More Related Videos

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.2K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.2K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Traditional response-adaptive randomization (RAR) updates assignments after each patient response, posing practical challenges in many clinical settings.
  • Existing RAR methods often struggle with delayed or missing patient response data, limiting their real-world applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel family of group response-adaptive randomization (RAR) procedures for clinical trials.
  • To address the impracticality of individual response-based RAR by introducing group-based updates.
  • To evaluate the performance and theoretical properties of the proposed group RAR design, particularly in scenarios with delayed or missing data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new group response-adaptive randomization procedure updating assignments based on aggregated patient responses.
  • Analysis of the proposed design's theoretical properties, comparing them to existing doubly adaptive biased coin designs (DBCD).
  • Numerical simulations to assess performance under various conditions, including delayed and randomly missing responses.

Main Results:

  • The proposed group doubly adaptive biased coin design (DBCD) maintains essential theoretical properties similar to existing DBCDs.
  • The group RAR design demonstrates robust performance in simulations involving delayed and randomly missing patient responses.
  • Successful application of the new group RAR design in a real clinical trial, showcasing its practicality and advantages.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed group response-adaptive randomization offers a practical and effective alternative to individual-response-based RAR in clinical trials.
  • This group RAR design is suitable for handling delayed and missing response data, enhancing trial efficiency.
  • The findings support the broader application of group response-adaptive designs in clinical research.